Habitus, Field and Capital the focus of this summary points with respect to the Habitus concepts, Fields and Capital, central offices of the workmanship of Pierre Bourdieu. For in such a way, I worked with texts of some books of this author: The Symbolic Power, Questions of Sociology, the Masculine Domination, Said Things, the Misery of the Written World and the book of Education, organized for Maria Alice Nogueira and Afrnio Catani, with texts of Bourdieu that not yet are available in Brazil. The interest in understanding as the author always used and developed its theories using these three concepts was what it guided this work. The field is a space of game and fight between new (dominated, pretending) and the dominant ones. It is a structuralized space of positions that are objects of disputes. The positions independem of its occupants to exist. Each field possesss properties its differentiates that them of the other fields although to possess laws that do not vary.
The dominant ones create the rules. Each field possesss one doxa, that is, implicit rules and truths that are known for the dominant ones of the field and that when being desveladas by the dominated ones they guarantee some possibility to them to impose new doxa. The rules are fight object. One of the logics of the field is that the involved ones possess interests in common. For example, in the scientific field all the involved ones have interest in being cited, beyond having scientific publications in magazines and periodicals; thus it has the reificao of that such doxa express the truth and in such a way imposes in a flow ' ' natural' '. The wealth that exist in the field are increase of capital. For each field it has a specific capital that it must be similar gathered of that its detainer can assume the dominncia position.
They are new forms of organization of the capitalist process caused by the changes techniques that impactantes in the process of industrial mutation between firms. They are the new forms, imposing a destruction on the old form and generating a new, intra-system. To this process, SCHUMPETER (1984, pp. 112-113), it called ' ' destruction criativa' '. Who is the responsible economic agent for the changes techniques generates innovation impactando in the competition of the economic system and imposing a new dynamics to the capitalist process giving, and in this, new configurations? For SCHUMPETER (1988, P. 56), the changes techniques that result in innovation derive from the new forms of combination of production factors, vision innovative, capable to carry through new combinations, not necessarily tied with a sole proprietorship. The entrepreneur function is not inherited, this is defined from its action with capacity to take the handle new combinations and to influence in the process of capitalist competition. For SCHUMPETER (1988 and 1997), it fits to the capitalist, or banker, to offer capitals to stimulate entrepreneur so that this creative promotes the promotion of the economic activity. 
It is the art to influence people to execute tasks with enthusiasm, motivation and espontaneidade. For Hunter (2004, p.70): The leadership starts with the will, that is our only capacity as human beings to syntonize our intentions with our actions and to choose our behavior. She is necessary to have will to choose to love, that is, feeling the real necessities, and not them desires, of that we lead. To take care of to these necessities, we need making use in them to even serve and exactly sacrificing in them. When we serve and we sacrifice in them for the others, we exert authority and influence and we gain the right to be called leaders. An efficient leadership is that one in which the secretaryship professional has the capacity to promote the growth of the people, taking care of to the necessities and not them desires of led and the reinforcement of the team. For this, firmness, determination, shrewdness, sacrifice, service, authority and courage must be together with values as patience, love, affectivity and sensitivity. 
1) Table tennis standards has length – 2,74 m, height – 0.76 m and width – 1.525 m. The game grid has a height of 15.25 cm 2) Thickness of table top 16 mm. For the amateur table, 19 mm. For the training level of tennis clubs, competition European level and training of professional athletes of 22 mm. 25 mm. 30 mm. 
