If he wanted it to continue training – maybe he would even professor. However, a diploma and plainclothes civilian career did not fascinate his military heredity family background, especially the Cossack ancestry. Yes, and in becomes boring, a thirst for knowledge was calling close to sources of further acquisitions. After four months of training, while continuing to serve, Dutov passed the exams for the entire course Nicholas engineering school and enrolled in an engineering battalion in Kiev, where he headed the sapper and wire classes. And soon the 25-year-old officer became the student of the Academy of General Staff, but was interrupted classes and went to the theater of military operations which started the Russian-Japanese war. There “for the excellent service and hard-specific works, Alexander Ilyich got his first medal – St. Stanislaus third degree. Continue their education had after the war.

In 1908 Dutov completed a course in the Academy under the first category, and again arrived at the service in – the headquarters of the 10 th Army Corps. In , where Dutov already served five years, this time he stayed only five months, after which he moved to Orenburg, where he served as a teacher and supervisor of the Orenburg Cossack school. According to the recollections of colleagues and the cadets, he was as zealous the master himself was ground, washed, corrected and glued training equipment, has made its catalog and inventory, is a model of discipline and organization, never being late or leaving before the time of service.

In the same period of its formative political career and the struggle for power, Hitler repeatedly managed to avoid the random bullets of police, fire weapons that disperse a demonstration of the National Socialists, sometimes at the expense of his supporters closes it from bullets. Here are some details of the attempt on the life of A. Hitler. " Typically, the Fuhrer is always followed, leaving the car to the place of celebration on the streets cent, Bavo's got a complimentary ticket to the guest rostrum, located just 10 meters from the place of the passage of Hitler.

However, unknown reasons at this time, Hitler changed its tradition and headed into the building on the opposite side of the street, about fifteen meters from the Bavo, in the distance beyond the reach of accurate pistol shot. Attempt was foiled. November 8, 1939 in celebration of 'beer coup 'all' old fighters', according to tradition, gathered in the pub 'Burger Broykeler'. Elzer, Johann Georg – Munich carpenter – planted a bomb in one of the columns of beer to kill Hitler during the lengthy speech, but again, for unclear reasons, the Fuhrer refused to talk and 10 minutes before the explosion left the pub. Assassination failed, but seven people were killed and 63 wounded. Three days later, Hitler came to Munich to attend the funeral of seven victims of sabotage. .

Introduction I come by means of this small summary to before argue the different contained cinematographic conceptions in the films of the belligerent powers (U.S.A., the Ussr, Germany and France) and during World War II. To argue this subject I used as bibliography the workmanship of the author Marc Ferro ' ' History of World War II ' '. This workmanship in such a way approaches the nations belligerent before as during the war and, has as objective to study eleven questions, amongst them the propaganda of the two sides of the war, the situation of France and its ' ' game duplo' ' led for Ptain and Laval, the pact full brother-Soviet, Pearl Harbor, the colonized extermnio of the Jews, resistance, peoples, the fascism and nazism among others studies. But for accomplishment of this small summary I will use only the first chapter of the workmanship of Marc Ferro ' ' The entrance in War: Public spirit and cinema' ' that it previously analyzes some cinematographic productions produced by the involved powers in the conflict cited, before and during the war, to understand as the public opinion psychologically prepared its population for this possible conflict. Better to understand this reading, I will divide the summary in three parts: annual report of the powers in war, the four belligerent nations (U.S.A., the Ussr, Germany and France), and its cinematographic productions and the final consideraes, analyzing them critically.

Annual report At the beginning of the text, the author makes a instigante question ' ' How the public opinion of the future belligerent countries entered in the war? ' '. Leaving of this question, Marc Ferro, it analyzes as the countries demonstrate for its people the future situation of its country case a war came to happen. It says that countries as France had entered in the war ' ' recuando' ' , not with ' ' a flower in fuzil' ' as in 1914 e, together with England with one politics ' ' pacfica' ' , they turn the ambitions Hitler to increase each time more, where the nazistas had not found intervention none, since the remilitarizao of the Rennia, the annexation of Austria and Tchecoslovquia, until the o support of the government of Francisco Franco against I legitimize republican government to it.