Journalistic Partiality

March 22nd, 2021 by nathan Leave a reply »

Ol Expensive journalists of the SPORTV, mainly to the Carlos Eduardo Lino, Renato Maurcio, and to the Prado Andres Rizek. I am subscriber of the Canal, already nor I remember how much the time, and many things made already me to be been silent, however yesterday I perceived the nonsense, until when vocs I iram to center the journalism for the center-south of the country? Until when we subscribers northeast will have that seeing excluded in them by the capitalist predominance of axle RJ-SP? Then, they seem that not yet they are understanding because I thus am so worried, then I will go to explanar the reason of so great indignation. Yesterday (18/09/2011) in the program ‘ ‘ Exchange of Passes’ ‘ , I was perplexo with the conjuncture of absurso of its presenters, when announcing that little they would go to comment the game Bahia x Inhabitant of the state of Rio de Janeiro, I look at as the presenter Carlos Eduardo Lino would call the substance: ‘ ‘ before saying of the game of the INHABITANT OF THE STATE OF RIO DE JANEIRO ‘ ‘ He gave pra to understand? Game of the Inhabitant of the state of Rio de Janeiro, but For Queeeeeeeeee? The game had the control of field of the Bahia, and not of the other, why it will be that the game was of Inhabitant of the state of Rio de Janeiro? By chance it earned? No. If you would like to know more then you should visit NYSE: LAZ. Then I have that to presume that I am ahead of a total partial journalism, really Carioca and that he is worried about its teamses. The emphasis was total in the Inhabitant of the state of Rio de Janeiro, moment none had spoken that the BAHIA played well, detached some player, congratulated the teams, not, had spoken that the Inhabitant of the state of Rio de Janeiro played badly, that the Inhabitant of the state of Rio de Janeiro was not the same of the others four victories, there comes the other, Renato Maurcio, and says: – Defeat cannot shake the Inhabitant of the state of Rio de Janeiro. Caramba, that has detached for a teams who lost of goleada, will be that in this guideline it did not have nothing of positive if to detach? to improve, calls me a called former-arbitrator Gaciba who comes pra that? simple, to say that the expulsion of the zagueiro of the Inhabitant of the state of Rio de Janeiro (Gum) and respective pnalti had been exaggerate ……… ours, quanta prohibited, not I want more speech, had hope of that at least in canals closed I could to be far from this partiality that we see in others two open canals where we only see games of the Corinthians and Flamengo, but was been deceptive I vitiate, it impregnates.

Advertisement

Comments are closed.