Archive for May, 2012

The Capitalist

May 30th, 2012

With a differentiated vision of Wedge (2002), Ferretti (2004) considers that the education had that to adjust itself to take care of the new requirements of the market, where the worker has that to develop new knowledge new abilities. The used term to indicate this new period of training was ' ' requalification profissional' ' understood not as the process for which the worker would be qualified of raised and complex type more, that he would also contemplate to know them already accumulated. (PAIVA, 1989, apud FERRETTI, 2004, P. 408). One becomes necessary a new form of if seeing and if arguing the relation Work and Education. One is not only about the junction of such concepts and nor so little to the separation to the same ones. In accordance with Axe (2005), is each more urgent time to deal with the quarrel the excellent elements of each concept in order to promote a cohesion in such debate. In accordance with Axe (2005), is necessary one another understanding of the education, in order not to only understand it as an alienator professional formation.

It is treated, for the opposite, to understand the education as a possibility of complete formation in all scopes of the life of the citizens; that is, it has of if worrying about the formation human being. At last, it is possible to verify, on the basis of the reflections gifts in this text, that the relation between Work and Education, possesss diversified vises that they send for different analyses. 5. CONCLUSIVE NOTES In short, it can be evidenced that the education and the work had always passed for changes that had affected its structure directly. These changes are, for example, pedagogical trends, the working revolutions, changes of the capitalist world, among others. One perceives that such changes had occurred for the effective historical context at each time in order to take care of the demands of evolution of the society.

The Capitalist

May 7th, 2012

They are new forms of organization of the capitalist process caused by the changes techniques that impactantes in the process of industrial mutation between firms. They are the new forms, imposing a destruction on the old form and generating a new, intra-system. To this process, SCHUMPETER (1984, pp. 112-113), it called ' ' destruction criativa' '. Who is the responsible economic agent for the changes techniques generates innovation impactando in the competition of the economic system and imposing a new dynamics to the capitalist process giving, and in this, new configurations? For SCHUMPETER (1988, P. 56), the changes techniques that result in innovation derive from the new forms of combination of production factors, vision innovative, capable to carry through new combinations, not necessarily tied with a sole proprietorship. The entrepreneur function is not inherited, this is defined from its action with capacity to take the handle new combinations and to influence in the process of capitalist competition. For SCHUMPETER (1988 and 1997), it fits to the capitalist, or banker, to offer capitals to stimulate entrepreneur so that this creative promotes the promotion of the economic activity.

The deserving greaters of the capitalist process are the owners of the capital, while the entrepreneurs assume the typical position of debtors with the incumbency to develop a productive activity, by means of the creative transformation of the means of production, with being able to generate profit and to reimburse the capitalist. A combination that has the power to decide the destination of the new combinations of the production factors. Thus? the capital and the credit are cerne of the question? , as indispensable elements to the promotion of the economic development. The credit that interests the Schumpeter is the associate to ' ' creation of rights on fruits of the future production, by means of the transference of purchasing power previous to the existence of the goods and if assumes lastre-lo' ' (YOU CAN, 1987, P.

Basic Principle of Capitalism

May 3rd, 2012

The basic principle of the capitalism is a economic system where it has the detainer of the capital or means of production (lands, machines, merchandises, etc.), and the supplier of the work force, where if it concentrates the great majority of the people. But, since its beginning, in middle of sc. XV, the capitalism had its some phases of development, passing of the commercial capitalism for the industrial capitalism, financial capitalism e, finally, the call informacional capitalism or of the knowledge. Such changes, had provoked the technological evolution, taking the man to a new social configuration, where perhaps, it never dares before to think, the globalizado world. Economic factors, social politicians and had been the desencadeantes of these changes, even so, coincidently, marked for the occurrence of two great world-wide wars, between a period and another one. As we know, the names, rules, capital goods, technology are changed, etc but the division of the capital continues different. A small parcel of the population it withholds the capital, therefore, the power and, the great mairoria, continues to vender its force of work. Although they are free and they have the illusion of that they could be rich, through the progress in one shining professional career or the great luck of a lottery prize.

Quanta illusion! Inside of this context, illusion and reality, are the Human being; a carrying individual of a dream, its force of work and its inexhaustible hope in the future. Future this, that seems to be threatened to each day, for innumerable problems that surround the life of the people proceeding from the proper globalizado world, of this new social configuration, or then, for the ghost of the unemployment, that devastates the life of a considerable parcel of the economically productive population and haunts, daily, the diligent classroom. The people are scared and with the sharpened perception more, its increasing difficulties and the constant notice that cross the oceans in fraction of seconds, you raise telling them of protests that come out here and there, disclosing a dissatisfaction generalized; the crises economic-financiers who sprout in the Europe to each day, and, more recently, in the United States.