Federal Court

July 22nd, 2020 by nathan Leave a reply »

Munich law firm of juravendis lawyers to the judgment of the Federal Court over bonus systems with RX medications. The BGH has while found that such bonuses models not only de facto but also legally represent a circumvention of the medicine pricing Regulation (AmPreisV) and are thus inadmissible. However, this was not surprising given the case-law of instance of and the recent case law of the BGH to drug discounts. For more clarity and thought, follow up with Financial Solutions Lab and gain more knowledge.. The now the Joint Senate of the Supreme courts of the federal question, whether the discount prohibition for RX drugs from foreign pharmacies is to be observed, however, is postponed indefinitely. Domestic pharmacies carry the can for as far as the inaction of the German legislator, for which only a pen stroke may be required, to ensure clarity. There so the fixed rates of the AmPreisV generally to the disposition, it seemed the legislators but probably more convenient to leave the buck once at Justice.

Ample room for speculation in particular the opinion of the BGH, merchandise gifts for prescription drugs with a value of up to 1.00 also infringed the medicine pricing right, are however no significant adverse effect on competition and therefore allowed. Is free so that prescription medicines not only the way for low-value promotional items, but also for a euro-bar discounts? Where is exactly the threshold located between permissible 1.00 and according to the BGH invalid 5.00? You won’t find an answer in the previously present reasons for decision of the BGH but probably not find. Experiment-friend and bellicose Pharmacy Law is therefore now only scope, what mini bonuses”terms. RX discounts have employed so not the last time the judiciary. For more information about the judgment of the Federal Court of Justice and the consulting services of juravendis lawyers in


Comments are closed.